Archive for ""
Audio: Two Epstein SCOTUScasts
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Blog Hat tip to George Best, '97, who alerted us to two Federalist Society SCOTUScasts featuring Richard Epstein, one on Christian Legal Society v. Martinez and one on Bilski v. Kappos. Read the rest of the...
Railroad Accident Attorney in Chicago – Laurence C. Acker
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Profiles In Law Chicago FELA Attorney Larry Acker is a very experienced appellate court advocate and trial lawyer. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 1973 and from Loyola University School of Law in 1976. After finishing law school, he obtained invaluable experience as a Cook County Public Defender, where he worked on a variety of [...] Read the rest of the...
Chicago FELA Lawyer – Robert E. Harrington, Jr.
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Profiles In Law Railroad Accident Attorney in Chicago Robert E. Harrington, Jr. has been a successful trial lawyer for more than 30 years. The foundation for his success, and his expertise in FELA litigation, started when Bob began trying railroad cases with his father and his uncle in 1977. In 1991, Bob was appointed a Designated Legal Counsel [...] Read the rest of the...
Alan A. Nicholson
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Profiles In Law Personal injury lawyer, C. Alan Nicholson, of the Marietta law firm, Nicholson & Associates, is experienced in representing all types of personal injury cases including medical malpractice, auto accidents, defective products, and workers compensation. Mr. Nicholson is a lifelong resident of Cobb County, Georgia and has dedicated his career to helping those whose lives have [...] Read the rest of the...
Buying Links is like Doping for Pro Athletes
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Legal Ulcer
Because you risk being penalized and hurting your brand's credibility. Only losers have to cheat anyway!
in reference to:"mpletely throw off someone’s backlink profile. There’s no amount o"
- Buying Links to Third Party Websites (view on Google Sidewiki)
Aiding and Abetting Charges in $22M Ponzi Scheme Reinstated Against Law Firm
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Law.com - Newswire A New York appeals court has reinstated aiding and abetting charges against a New Jersey law firm in a suit by investors over its alleged role in a $22 million Ponzi scheme. A lower court in 2008 granted Lum, Drasco & Positan's motion to dismiss the charges by investors who claimed the lawyers knew about the undisclosed criminal histories of the scheme's perpetrators prior to its unraveling. But the appeals court judge reversed, saying the investors had adequately alleged the lawyers had actual knowledge of the fraud. Read the rest of the...
16 Senators to Watch During Kagan Vote
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Law.com - Newswire Elena Kagan is all but certain to be confirmed as the newest U.S. Supreme Court justice, likely within a month. The votes of a small group of senators will largely determine the margin. Among those whose position is unclear are the seven Republican senators who voted to confirm Kagan as solicitor general, as well as those who voted to confirm Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The views of a pair of new Republican senators are unknown, while NRA opposition to Kagan is focusing attention on Democrats who favor gun rights. Read the rest of the...
2nd Circuit Finds Novartis Drug Reps Not Exempt From Overtime Law
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: Law.com - Newswire Current and former sales representatives for Novartis Pharmaceuticals are not exempt from qualifying for overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the 2nd Circuit ruled Tuesday. Adopting an interpretation of the law urged by the U.S. Department of Labor, the circuit reinstated the claims of some 2,500 plaintiffs who argued they should be paid overtime for working in excess of 40 hours per week. One lawyer for the plaintiffs estimated that damages could be in the area of $100 million. Read the rest of the...
White House Appeals Controversial Drilling-Ban Ruling
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010$247,500 Accident Settlement Obtained One Week Prior to Trial
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: SettlementBoard.com Attorney John M. Burke of the NJ accident law firm, Koles, Burke & Bustillo, L.L.P., obtained a $247,500 settlement a mere week prior to the scheduled 2007 trial. Mr. Burke's client, car accident victim hit a guard rail after being cut off by a driver who immediately fled the scene of the accident in NJ. [...] Read the rest of the...
Predicted Gun-Litigation Flurry Starts With a Bang in Chicago
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010How Does FELA Differ From Workers’ Compensation?
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: SettlementBoard.com FELA cases are subject to a three-year statute of limitations, which means that you must commence your action within three years of the date of the injury, or your claim will be forever barred. Also, it is important to note that although the worker's own negligence will not bar recovery, the amount of the award [...] Read the rest of the...
Rude Law School Applicants Beware: You Are Not That Anonymous
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Law Prof Files Suit Claiming Duquesne Discriminated in Appointment of Interim Dean
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Ten Things Every Business Must Know About China.
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010The All Roads Blog has an excellent post up, entitled, "20 Things I Have Learned About China." This post discusses my favorite ten of those twenty. Go here for the other ten.
1. There is no “China”, and there is no “Chinese consumer”. This is a BIG country full of people and places that range in ways that are rarely appreciated. I hate listing this as one of my favorites because it is such a cliche, but I am listing it not so much from a marketers perspective, but to remind people not to stereotype the businesspeople with whom they deal in China. Broad generalizations about how "Chinese do this" or "Chinese do that," while perhaps often true, never apply across the board.
2. There is no “Poorly Made in China”. There is only poorly understood, badly planned, and horribly managed. Amen. Quality Inspection Blog does an excellent riff on this one, in a post entitled, "The giant hole in China quality assurance programs."
3. Legal documents and due diligence are necessary steps (some say boxes to check), but that is just the beginning of the journey, and at some point a firm will...
Marley Engineered Products Recalls Baseboard Heaters Sold at Grainger Due to Fire Hazard
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Source: SettlementBoard.com In a Recall Alert posted on July 6, 2010,the The Office of Information and Public Affairs states, "The following product safety recall was voluntarily conducted by the firm in cooperation with the CPSC. Consumers should stop using the product immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer [...] Read the rest of the...
Appeals Court Says ‘See No Evil’ Approach Can’t Shield Law Firm in Investor Suit
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010‘Sequel’ or ‘Spinoff?’ For Actor, a Distinction With a Big Difference
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010SOCIAL NETWORKING: A TRAP FOR THE UNWARY.
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Are Your Recruiters Exempt or Non-Exempt? Recent Court Cases Scrutinize Staffing Industry Classification Practices
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Education: Requiring Use of Electronic Book Readers May Violate ADA/504.
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010China State Secrets. Buyer Beware.
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010Stan Abrams over at China Hearsay has a great post on the China state secrets case against Xue Feng, the Chinese-American recently convicted in China and sentenced to eight years.
I was not going to write about this case for the simple reason that I do not know what to say about it because I just do not have even one tenth the information necessary to opine as to his guilt or innocence. This of course never stops the media, who tend to jump right in and write on these sorts of cases as clear-cut morality plays.
Abrams will have done of that; he instead does a great job raising (but not answering) the following key questions surrounding Xue's conviction:
1. Was Xue treated fairly during his incarceration and interrogation? He claims to have been beaten and otherwise abused while in custody. As he has no legal recourse at this point with respect to these accusations, I assume that this matter will simply be dropped.
2. Was this database classified as containing state secrets done so before or after Xue obtained it? Any sort of ex post facto classification would be extremely difficult for the government to...





