Brown Rudnick Likely to Escape Sanctions for Improper Redaction
August 4, 2010 | By: Editor
Source: Law.com – Newswire
Concluding Brown Rudnick did not intentionally or recklessly violate a confidentiality order by failing to properly redact information from a key complaint, the examiner’s report in the Tribune bankruptcy is cause for relief at the law firm. The examiner also concluded Brown Rudnick had the right to file the complaint and did not violate a court order in doing so. The firm, representing a trustee for creditors in the bankruptcy, will likely escape serious sanctions, though it might have to pay attorney fees to JPMorgan Chase.
Read the rest of the story…
Category: Breaking News | RSS 2.0






One Comments
Mistakes in failing to properly redact documents is a frequent occurrence even though redaction is a critical process. These mistakes usually have serious ramifications which raises questions as to whether organizations have sufficient review procedures in place or aren’t using the right tools to redact sensitive information.
The organization I currently work for has been redacting sensitive documents for a number of years and in that time have not had one redaction failure.
We use a tool called RapidRedact and it’s helped us to keep all sensitive information the way we like it; permanently removed and not mistakenly released for public viewing.