Appeals Court Says ‘See No Evil’ Approach Can’t Shield Law Firm in Investor Suit
July 7, 2010 | By: Editor
Source: ABA Journal Top Stories
A “see no evil, hear no evil” approach can’t shield a law firm from an aiding-and-abetting claim in an investor suit, a New York appeals court has ruled. The appeals court reinstated the claim against Lum, Drasco & Positan, formerly known as Lum, Danzis, Drasco & Positan, the New York Law Journal reports. The court said the investor plaintiffs, who lost $1.9 million in a real estate investment company that turned out to be a $22 million Ponzi scheme, had adequately alleged lawyers at the firm had actual knowledge of the fraud. The plaintiffs had claimed Lum Drasco lawyers were…
Read the rest of the story…
Category: Breaking News | RSS 2.0






No Comments